Bollen reports contributing a named TOCTOU/atomicity requirement to AISVS that does not appear in the released v1.0 text [unverified-mechanism]

AISVS 1.0's Contributors and Reviewers list confirms "Joe-B-Security (Joe-B-Security)" as a credited contributor — a direct quote from the primary PDF's frontispiece, Tier 1. Separately, a blog post signed "©2026 Joe Bollen" at joesec.me ("TOCTOU Race Conditions in Multi-Agent Systems," dated 2026-04-05, Tier 3) argues that AISVS's C9.2 approval-binding requirements address a different TOCTOU pattern (an approval/execution race within one agent's own workflow) than the one its author says he identified: concurrent agents sharing mutable state, "where each agent's logic is individually correct but the interleaving creates a security violation." The post states its author opened an issue with a case study that "was accepted as a new requirement (PR), adding atomicity controls for concurrent agent operations on shared state to the standard."

[unverified-mechanism -- needs primary]: the specific requirement described does not appear anywhere in the verified AISVS 1.0 text. The 9.8.7/9.8.8 numbering — along with the detail that the requirement names TOCTOU explicitly and requires atomic execution — was reported to the capturing session only by the excluded WebFetch/GitHub-API triangulation, not by Bollen himself: his post (re-fetched 2026-07-22) gives no requirement number, describing the accepted addition only as "atomicity controls for concurrent agent operations on shared state" and recommending transactions, optimistic locking, or compare-and-swap as mitigations. The C9 chapter's requirements end at 9.6.3, with no C9.7 or C9.8 subsection in either the table of contents or the chapter body (claim-aisvs-1-0-omits-toctou-and-lost-update-terminology). An attempt to independently corroborate the claim via GitHub's issue/PR/commit API (through WebFetch) returned specific, internally-consistent-looking detail — an issue number, PR number, commit SHA, a diff — that could not be reconciled with the primary document once checked directly, and is excluded here as unreliable rather than cited as fact. Tracked as question-verify-bollen-aisvs-concurrent-toctou-requirement.

Update 2026-07-28 (cross-model audit): the excluded triangulation has been re-run against GitHub's REST API and confirmed real — issue #640, PR #641 (merged 2026-04-05 by Jim Manico), merge commit 4d3dc560e8e7fddcbdf517a439af8fe91b9fe6b0 adding requirement 9.8.8 to 1.0/en/0x10-C09-Orchestration-and-Agentic-Action.md. Both halves of this note's title are therefore true at once: Bollen's requirement was accepted and merged, and it does not appear in the released v1.0 text — it was removed or renumbered during the May–June 2026 editorial reduction passes before the release lock. Full receipts in the corrected observation-webfetch-fabricated-aisvs-issue-640-pr-641-across-two-sessions.