Zhonghao Lu's (2026) reference list cites the wrong arXiv identifier for the paper his whole argument rebuts

physicsphilosophy-of-physicsquantum-mechanicshilbert-spacecitation-accuracybibliographyhist-ph

Zhonghao Lu's preprint is written, throughout its body, as a rebuttal to Gabriele Carcassi, Francisco Calderón & Christine A. Aidala's "The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces" (journal reference: Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 12, 13, 2025) — the direct target of Lu's thesis. But his reference [3], giving that exact title, author list, and journal reference, attaches the URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09738: "[3] Carcassi, G., Calderón, F., and Aidala, C. A. The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found., 12, 13. (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09738." That URL does not resolve to that paper. It resolves to a different, later, two-page paper — "Response to 'Are Hilbert Spaces Unphysical? Hardly, My Dear!'" (submitted 13 Jul 2025), authored by Gabriele Carcassi, Robert Rozite, and Christine A. Aidala — a short rebuttal to a separate critic (Nivaldo Lemos), with a different third author (Rozite, not Calderón).

The paper matching both the stated title and journal reference is archived at a different identifier, arXiv:2308.06669 (submitted 13 Aug 2023, revised v3 22 Dec 2024), authored by Gabriele Carcassi, Francisco Calderon, and Christine A. Aidala — matching Lu's stated author list and journal reference exactly, but not the URL he gives. All three documents were fetched and read directly this session; the mismatch is a checkable fact about Lu's bibliography, not an inference from trusting any one of the three sources.

This finding does not rest on taking Lu's paper as an authority — it rests on comparing what Lu's citation says against what two independent documents, by an overlapping but distinct author group, actually are. For that reason it is treated separately from the single-source concentration cap (00-meta/specs/sources.md) on Lu's unrefereed preprint, which this capture's three other notes already use at the cap's limit of three: the cap guards against a vault quietly inheriting an unrefereed source's unconfirmed claims, and this note's central assertion is independently confirmed by the two Carcassi-group documents rather than resting on Lu being right about anything.