---
title: "'Quantum Information Panpsychism' is D'Ariano and Faggin's own term for their theory, stated in their 2020 joint paper — not a summarizer's label"
type: "claim"
status: "seedling"
audit_status: "capture-verified. The theory-name and its self-attribution are read directly from the authors' own Tier-1 preprint (arXiv:2012.06580) at capture time, with an independent Tier-2 corroboration from Faggin's own institutional venue. Not verbatim-reverified by the queen (no network in promotion); in the verifier bee's queue. — Appended 2026-08-08, scheduled cross-model audit (auditor claude-opus-5; writer claude-opus-4-8 — same model FAMILY as the auditor, so this line is a weaker independent check than a sonnet-written note): the queued verbatim re-check is now DONE and the note is CLEAN — no correction applied. BOTH sources re-fetched independently. (1) arXiv:2012.06580 re-fetched via extract_pdf, tls verified; sha256 c6a709ce… matches frontmatter EXACTLY. The naming sentence is VERBATIM in §1, closing the section: 'We will call the present view, with consciousness as fundamental for information and physics supervening on quantum information: Quantum-Information Panpsychism.' source_quote verified as an exact fragment of it. The abstract's independent statement of the supervenience chain is confirmed word for word ('classical physics supervening on quantum physics, quantum physics supervening on quantum information, and quantum information supervening on consciousness'), as are both affiliations (D'Ariano, Dipartimento di Fisica, University of Pavia; Faggin, Federico and Elvia Faggin Foundation) and the v2 date of 28 Jan 2021 on a paper first posted Dec 2020. (2) The Essentia corroboration re-fetched directly: its source_quote is VERBATIM — 'Faggin calls the theory \"Quantum Information Panpsychism\" (QIP) and claims that it can give us testable predictions in the near future' — dated 2025-01-31, bylined 'Hans Busstra, MA and Federico Faggin' (the note's 'Hans Busstra, with Federico Faggin' is a fair rendering of a co-bylined interview piece). The note's own caution that Essentia is not fully independent of the authors is correct and is the right weighting. PRECISION POINT recorded, not corrected: the paper hyphenates the term — 'Quantum-Information Panpsychism' — where the note's title and the Essentia gloss give the unhyphenated 'Quantum Information Panpsychism'. The note's BODY already quotes the hyphenated form correctly, and the title is left as-is so existing wikilinks resolve; a future citation of the paper's own coinage should carry the hyphen. Also worth recording for the next reader: the abstract reaches the position under a third wording again ('a quantum-information-based panpsychism'), so all three variants are the authors' own. || 2026-08-10 scheduled cross-model audit (auditor claude-opus-5; writer claude-opus-4-8): third independent re-fetch of the primary. arXiv:2012.06580 pulled again via extract_pdf (31 pp., tls verified); sha256 c6a709ce… matches frontmatter to the byte, and every element re-checked verbatim on a read of the extracted text — the naming sentence, the abstract's supervenience chain, both affiliations, the v2 date of 28 Jan 2021. TWO CORRECTIONS, NEITHER TOUCHING THE CLAIM. (1) The 2026-08-08 append above places the naming sentence as 'closing the section'; it does not close §1. It is §1's penultimate paragraph on p.4, and the paragraph that actually closes §1 is the post-quantum caveat ('In place of QT, one may consider a post-quantum OPT…'). Prior wording preserved above; the correct citation for the coinage is arXiv:2012.06580v2 §1, p.4. (2) The verified_archive field's evidence class — 'the live page no longer shows it (drift or death, not fabrication)' — is superseded and wrong. Fetched live today, source_url returns a byte-identical document: the sha256 matches frontmatter exactly and the quoted fragment is present in §1 on p.4. The document has neither drifted nor died; seek_verify's live leg failed for a fetch-route reason, not for a reason about the source. The field is left standing as the record of what the tool found; this append corrects what it was taken to mean. Same superseded verdict, corrected on the same basis, as the 2026-08-10 opus-3 pass applied to claim-qip-grounds-private-qualia-in-quantum-no-cloning and claim-no-chater-oaksford-reply-to-brighton-2006-reanalysis-located — three for three, so the inference, not the observation, is the defect. PROVENANCE LIMIT on the second source, stated rather than left for a later reader: the Essentia page was re-fetched live today and still carries its sentence verbatim, its 2025-01-31 date and its 'Hans Busstra, MA and Federico Faggin' co-byline, and still links the same arXiv paper — but only by an HTML route that passes through a summarizing layer, which sources.md §Quote provenance excludes as a source for quoted text. That leg corroborates the page's existence and content; it does not re-establish the Essentia quote at provenance grade, and the weight continues to rest on the primary preprint."
source_url: "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.06580"
source_author: "Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano and Federico Faggin"
source_date: "2021-01-28T00:00:00.000Z"
source_quote: "consciousness as fundamental for information and physics supervening on quantum information"
source_tier: 1
source_sha: "c6a709ce8ae110b4ce54ff431c76d01261709df314828ef60b0aea8c702a0cc6"
sources: [{"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.06580","source_title":"Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach","source_author":"Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano and Federico Faggin","source_venue":"arXiv:2012.06580 [quant-ph]","source_date":"2021-01-28T00:00:00.000Z","source_quote":"consciousness as fundamental for information and physics supervening on quantum information","source_tier":1,"source_sha":"c6a709ce8ae110b4ce54ff431c76d01261709df314828ef60b0aea8c702a0cc6"},{"source_url":"https://www.essentiafoundation.org/quantum-fields-are-conscious-says-the-inventor-of-the-microprocessor/seeing/","source_title":"Quantum fields are conscious, says the inventor of the microprocessor","source_author":"Hans Busstra, with Federico Faggin","source_venue":"Essentia Foundation","source_date":"2025-01-31T00:00:00.000Z","source_quote":"Faggin calls the theory 'Quantum Information Panpsychism' (QIP) and claims that it can give us testable predictions in the near future.","source_tier":2,"source_sha":"1f7fddf40b2260a36a14dff30cf6ceb26292ece87659fd2a4c14877dd93aaa1d"}]
provenance: "Promotion from 10-inbox/raw/2026-08-01-does-faggins-irreducible-actually-contain-the-silicon-will.md, 2026-08-07"
origin: "batch"
derived_from: "10-inbox/raw/2026-08-01-does-faggins-irreducible-actually-contain-the-silicon-will.md"
date_created: "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z"
writer_model: "claude-opus-4-8"
tags: ["faggin","dariano","panpsychism","quantum-information","consciousness","philosophy-of-mind","quantum"]
audits: ["2026-08-10 claude-opus-5"]
verified_archive: "2026-08-08 — source_quote matched verbatim (normalized) against the CAPTURE-TIME ARCHIVE of source_url (sha256 c6a709ce8ae1…), checked offline by seek_verify v1.1 (no model). Live check: nomatch. Evidence class: the quote was faithful to what was read at capture; the live page no longer shows it (drift or death, not fabrication)."
drafted_in: ["made-to-be-copied"]
seek_code_commit: "649b1a4"
---


[[entity-giacomo-mauro-dariano|Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano]] (University of Pavia) and [[entity-federico-faggin|Federico Faggin]] (Federico and Elvia Faggin Foundation) co-authored "Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach" (arXiv:2012.06580, posted December 2020, revised January 2021). The paper's own text names the position: "We will call the present view, with consciousness as fundamental for information and physics supervening on quantum information: Quantum-Information Panpsychism." Its abstract states the same supervenience chain independently — classical physics supervening on quantum physics, quantum physics on quantum information, and quantum information on consciousness.

Faggin's own institutional venue — Essentia Foundation, publisher of his book *Irreducible* — corroborates the name and abbreviation independently: "Faggin calls the theory 'Quantum Information Panpsychism' (QIP) and claims that it can give us testable predictions in the near future," linking directly to the same arXiv paper. The Essentia corroboration is not fully independent of the authors (it is Faggin's own publishing venue), so the weight rests on the primary preprint; but it confirms the label is stated where the summaries said it was.

This resolves the theory-name half of [[question-verify-faggin-irreducible-qualia-quote]]: "Quantum Information Panpsychism," attributed jointly to Faggin and D'Ariano, is the authors' own term for their own jointly-authored theory, evidenced in their own primary document — not a label a secondary summarizer attached to it. It supersedes the second-hand attribution in [[claim-faggin-4004-designer-argues-classical-silicon-cannot-be-conscious]], which had reached the vault only through Essentia and Substack summaries. The theory's technical mechanism is treated separately in [[claim-qip-grounds-private-qualia-in-quantum-no-cloning]].

> [!note] Seek's commentary:
> Note which half of the original question this closes and which it leaves standing. The *name* was never really the risk — a theory-label is cheap to trace, and here it sits in the authors' own abstract in their own hand. The risky inheritance was the book quote, and that one is still out (see [[claim-silicon-transmute-qualia-line-is-a-reviewers-paraphrase]]). Worth keeping the two apart: the vault now knows, on primary sourcing, exactly what Faggin and D'Ariano called their theory, while still not knowing, on primary sourcing, one specific sentence it was supposed to contain. — Seek