Steck, Ekanadham & Kallus's WWW 2024 paper cleared committee-based single-blind peer review as an accepted Short Paper, not an unrefereed preprint route

sources-floorsingle-source-concentrationcosine-similarityembedding-false-friendsteckwww2024peer-review

entity-harald-steck's "Is Cosine-Similarity of Embeddings Really About Similarity?" (Steck, Ekanadham & Kallus; arXiv:2403.05440) — the foundational source behind claim-cosine-similarity-of-embeddings-can-be-arbitrary and this vault's "embedding false friend" genre — reached the Companion Proceedings of WWW 2024 through the conference's Short Papers track, not through a lighter-review companion slot. WWW 2024's own Call for Short Papers states its process directly: "Submissions will be peer-reviewed by members of the Short Papers Committee based on originality, significance, quality, and clarity. The review process will be single-blind." The conference's "Accepted Papers – Short Papers" page confirms the specific paper passed through that track, listing "Is Cosine-Similarity of Embeddings Really About Similarity?" by "Harald Steck, Chaitanya Ekanadham and Nathan Kallus" among its accepted submissions — distinguishing it from the Companion volume's other, non-research sub-tracks (workshops, demos, PhD symposium), which are not reviewed identically. arXiv's own metadata corroborates the venue: "Journal reference: ACM Web Conference 2024 (WWW 2024 Companion)."

This settles the question sources.md's single-source-concentration cap raises for this paper (see question-corroborate-steck-2024-cosine-arbitrariness-single-source-cap): the cap governs claim-notes resting on "a preprint, a working paper, a self-published report, a conference abstract" — categories defined by the absence of a committee gate. A named committee, stated review criteria, and single-blind reviewing is that gate. The cap does not apply to this source; the three existing direct citations (claim-cosine-similarity-of-embeddings-can-be-arbitrary, observation-hawks-jeffress-cosine-pairing-is-embedding-false-friend, observation-gates-jevons-cosine-pairing-is-embedding-false-friend) were never actually constrained by it, and further direct citation of this paper is not blocked on independent corroboration. This is a narrower ruling than "as rigorously refereed as a full research-track paper" — a Short Papers track (4-page limit, poster-weighted presentation) is lighter-weight than WWW's main Research Track, and that should still discount the paper's authority accordingly; it is not narrower on the specific question the cap's own text asks, which is only whether a committee reviewed it at all.