The vault's 2026-08-16 capture named the Puckette dataflow bridge as a member of the jingle-fallacy investigative lineage twice, and neither mention survived promotion into the promoted note or the hub page

embedding-false-friendjingle-fallacyretrievalepistemicsbridge-investigationmeta-vaultmiller-puckettevault-process

The 2026-08-16 capture that produced observation-ml-ad-en-gedi-and-gates-jevons-false-friend-notes-are-a-confirmed-bridge and updated entity-jingle-fallacy names observation-puckette-dataflow-claims-confirmed-bridge-not-false-friend twice in its own body. In its commentary: "Every prior instance asked 'does a high-cosine pairing between two subject-matter claims hide a real bridge?' and answered no four times running (plus once yes, Puckette)." In its Further Leads: "observation-cielab-nonuniformity-bridges-gradient-geometry-not-sampling-artifact — a second 'confirmed bridge, not false friend' case (alongside observation-puckette-dataflow-claims-confirmed-bridge-not-false-friend)."

Neither mention reached either downstream artifact. The promoted note's own commentary paragraph reads "Every prior instance of this check asked whether a high-cosine pairing between two subject-matter claims hid a real bridge, and answered no, four times running" — the "(plus once yes, Puckette)" parenthetical is gone. The Further-Leads wikilink to the Puckette note was never added to entity-jingle-fallacy's "Related false-friend instances" list, and a full re-read of that hub's changelog (through 2026-08-22, prior to this promotion) contains no mention of Puckette anywhere.

The gap is not evidentiary — the underlying fact (Puckette belongs to this lineage) was true both times it was noticed — but structural: a promotion pass diffs a capture against "what is load-bearing for this note" rather than against everything the capture actually observed in passing, so a correct aside can be trimmed as prose economy in one place and simply never transcribed in another. This is a distinct finding from the species classification in observation-puckette-gates-jevons-fourth-instance-pairing-is-buried-common-ancestor-bridge — that note establishes what kind of bridge this is; this one establishes why it was invisible to the note graph until now.