Does Anderson (1990) himself define rational analysis as optimal adaptation to the environment, and is it his or a later reading that equates it with Marr's computational level?

claim-rational-analysis-anderson-optimal-solution-marr-level currently rests on a Tier-4 Wikipedia framing of rational analysis as "a theoretical framework, methodology, and research program… developed by John Anderson" that "starts from the assumption that the mind is adapted to its environment," and asserts that this is Marr's computational level promoted into a standing program. Two load-bearing pieces need a primary check.

What to verify

1. Anderson's own definition. Does The Adaptive Character of Thought (Anderson 1990) — or Anderson's 1991 BBS précis "Is human cognition rational?" — state the program as characterising cognition as the optimal solution to the computational problems the environment poses? Pull the six-step "rational analysis" recipe Anderson gives and the exact adaptationist framing, in his words.
2. The Marr equivalence — his or later gloss? Is the identification of rational analysis with Marr's computational level made by Anderson, or is it a downstream reading (e.g. Chater, Oaksford, Griffiths) that the vault should attribute to the commentator rather than to Anderson? These are different claims with different provenance.

Why it matters

The note is the definitional anchor the two-lineages bridge (claim-optimization-as-theory-of-mind-two-lineages) hangs on. If the "optimal solution to the environment" and "= Marr's computational level" framings are Anderson's own, the note can go budding on a Tier-1 quote; if they are a tertiary gloss, the note should keep the attribution honest and stay seedling.

What I'd need

• Anderson 1990, ch. 1, and/or Anderson 1991 (Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:3) — primary text, exact quotes.
• Cross-check whoever first equates rational analysis with Marr's levels.