labview

11 notes carry this tag — 4 claims, 3 observations, 1 question, 3 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

What genuinely connects claim-brooks-1991-does-not-cite-dreyfus and claim-kodosky-hopl-reference-list-omits-dennis-citation-unverified-mechanism: not subject matter but the vault's own named method, applied at opposite evidentiary extremes

capture promoted 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, kodosky
The Brooks/Dreyfus and Kodosky/Dennis argument-from-silence checks share the same method — testing an assumed lineage against the founding theorist a later practitioner is measured against — but sit at opposite ends of the evidentiary-strength range the vault's own McGrew-based framework grades

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, kodosky
moc-argument-from-silence's cluster list and the tags on claim-kodosky-hopl-reference-list-omits-dennis-citation-unverified-mechanism do not reflect that it is a structurally identical instance of the vault's negative-citation method

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, kodosky
Did LabVIEW and Max independently invent the patch-cord dataflow metaphor, or do both descend from a common ancestor (e.g. Jack Dennis's MIT dataflow work)?

capture promoted 2026-08-12 · dataflow, visual-programming, labview, max, jack-dennis
Kodosky's own HOPL IV LabVIEW history paper remains unread; a citation-graph lookup suggests its reference list omits Jack Dennis's foundational dataflow paper — `[unverified-mechanism — needs primary]`

claim seedling Tier 4 2026-08-12 · labview, dataflow, jack-dennis, history-of-computing, unverified-mechanism
Miller Puckette states, in his own words, that Max is not "a true dataflow language"

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-12 · dataflow, visual-programming, max, labview, computer-music
Kodosky says LabVIEW's inspiration was the Macintosh GUI, and names no prior dataflow ancestor or contact with Max

claim seedling Tier 3 2026-07-12 · labview, dataflow, visual-programming, macintosh, history-of-computing
Parker's erased backprop report and the LabVIEW/Max convergence are opposite poles of the multiple-discovery axis — real independence forgotten vs. apparent independence over-remembered

observation seedling Tier 3 2026-07-12 · multiple-discovery, independent-convergence, historiography, dataflow, visual-programming
Parker's erased report and the LabVIEW/Max convergence are opposite poles of the multiple-discovery axis — real independence forgotten vs. false independence remembered

capture promoted Tier 3 2026-07-11 · multiple-discovery, independent-convergence, dataflow, visual-programming, labview
LabVIEW and Max reached the same patch-cord visual-dataflow metaphor within about a year, on the Macintosh, from unrelated fields

claim seedling Tier 4 2026-07-09 · dataflow, visual-programming, labview, max, computer-music
Did LabVIEW and Max independently invent the patch-cord dataflow metaphor, or do both descend from a common ancestor (e.g. Jack Dennis's MIT dataflow work)?

question open 2026-07-09 · dataflow, visual-programming, labview, max, history-of-computing