all tags

rumelhart

12 notes carry this tag — 5 claims, 2 observations, 1 question, 4 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• What genuinely connects Hinton's 2007→2022 reversal on backprop-in-the-brain and the 1986 Nature paper's 'demonstration, not invention' contribution?
  capture seedling 2026-09-13 · hinton, backpropagation, biological-plausibility, forward-forward, history-of-ml
• What genuinely connects the RHW 1986 four-reference list and Werbos's DOCSUB block? Chronology and document identity say: nothing causal
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-17 · werbos, rumelhart, backpropagation, citation-history, docsub
• Werbos's DOCSUB episode entered the public record 7–12 years after RHW's 1986 Nature paper, foreclosing a causal reading
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-17 · werbos, rumelhart, backpropagation, citation-history, docsub
• The 0.87 cosine pairing between the RHW 1986 reference list and Werbos's DOCSUB block is thematic resemblance, not a causal bridge
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-17 · embeddings, cosine-similarity, retrieval, epistemics, werbos
• David Rumelhart is the unnamed hinge connecting the vault's schema-change cluster and its backpropagation-origins cluster — one trajectory from the 1978 tuning/restructuring taxonomy to the 1986 backprop revival
  observation seedling Tier 4 2026-07-12 · rumelhart, connectionism, schema-theory, backpropagation, ai-history
• Did Rumelhart himself frame schema 'tuning' (1978) as a deliberate through-line to gradient-descent weight-tuning (1986), or is the 'tuning' echo retrospective?
  question answered 2026-07-12 · rumelhart, schema-theory, backpropagation, connectionism, tuning
• David Rumelhart is the hinge under both seed notes — he coined the tuning/restructuring taxonomy AND co-led the backprop revival
  capture promoted Tier 2 2026-07-11 · rumelhart, connectionism, schema-theory, backpropagation, prediction-error
• The 1986 Nature paper's contribution was demonstrating that backpropagation learns useful internal representations — not inventing the algorithm
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-07-07 · rumelhart, hinton, williams, backpropagation, internal-representations
• David Parker's 1985 backprop rediscovery was an internal MIT technical report (TR-47), credited by RHW 1986 only as "personal communication" with no reference entry
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-07-06 · parker, backpropagation, technical-report, citation-history, rumelhart
• The 1986 backpropagation Nature paper cites only four references — none of the earlier independent derivations
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-07-06 · rumelhart, hinton, williams, backpropagation, citation-history
• Capture: What did the 1986 Rumelhart, Hinton & Williams Nature paper add that earlier formulations did not?
  capture promoted Tier 2 2026-06-29 · backpropagation, rumelhart, hinton, williams, history-of-ml
• Linnainmaa has priority over reverse-mode automatic differentiation but not paternity — his work had no traceable causal influence on backpropagation's adoption in AI
  claim budding Tier 4 2026-06-26 · linnainmaa, backpropagation, history-of-computation, automatic-differentiation, reverse-mode-ad