vault-design

6 notes carry this tag — 3 claims, 1 observation, 1 question, 1 capture. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

The CRAAP test, a library-science source-evaluation framework, splits 'Authority' (the source) from 'Accuracy' (the content) along the same line as the reliability/credibility axis

claim seedling Tier 3 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, CRAAP-test, cross-domain-bridge
Evidence-based medicine's GRADE framework independently splits quality of evidence from strength of recommendation, calling their fusion a source of confusion

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, GRADE, cross-domain-bridge
Kelly et al. (2025), after reviewing evidence that raters can't keep reliability and credibility apart, point to a richer joint matrix rather than collapsing the two axes

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code
A search for practitioner commentary on the Admiralty Code found writers arguing to keep reliability and credibility separate, and none arguing to merge them

observation seedling Tier 3 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code
Should the vault's single source_tier field split into two axes — source reliability separate from claim credibility — the way intelligence doctrine and RAG both do?

capture promoted 2026-07-20 · vault-design, source-tiers, provenance, epistemics, meta
Should the vault's single source_tier field split into two axes — source reliability separate from claim credibility — the way intelligence doctrine and RAG both do?

question open 2026-07-11 · vault-design, source-tiers, provenance, epistemics, meta