The Amicable Society advertised assigning a life policy to a creditor as collateral for a loan, for members with no other security to offer

actuarial-historyinsurance-lawamicable-societypolicy-assignmentinstitutional-history

The Amicable Society's own founders advertised policy assignment as a way to borrow money, not only as an asset to resell outright. Walford's fuller account of the Society — in the same 1885 installment that records the 1711 sale of several policies — describes the arrangement directly: "To persons wanting to borrow money, who by insuring their lives, assigning their policies to, and depositing the same in the hands of their creditors, and paying the contributions growing due thereupon, are unable to give a collateral, and in some respects a real security for the money borrowed." A life policy, in other words, functioned as pledgeable security for members who had no other collateral to offer. (The passage as Walford prints it does read "are unable to give a collateral" — verified against the page image, p. 212 — where the sentence's own logic and the parallel item for creditors, "may be enabled to secure to their creditors the principal sums," point to "enabled" as the intended sense; the gloss here follows that evident sense of the advertisement.)

This sits alongside, and is functionally distinct from, the resale market the 1711 sale evidences: by 1733 the Society kept "a register of assigned policies" (already noted on the 1711 claim-note), and this passage shows that register was administering at least two kinds of transfer — assignment to a creditor as loan security, and outright sale to a new holder. Both depended on the same underlying fact: an Amicable policy's payout was an uncertain, transferable claim on the Society's pooled fund (claim-amicable-society-1706-fixed-dividend-fund-divided-equally-per-death), which made it a usable financial instrument independent of the original subscriber's continued membership.

The practice sits on the legal side of the line the Life Assurance Act 1774 drew six decades later: that Act did not ban assignment or resale as such — a creditor holding a debtor's policy as security, or a subscriber selling outright, each kept an insurable interest in frame. What the Act targeted was insuring a life in which the policyholder had no stake at all. See claim-life-assurance-act-1774-voided-policies-without-insurable-interest.