Do DoD IG audits DODIG-2021-077 and DODIG-2022-127 mention AC Gravity, AATIP, or AAWSAP by name, or contain their own OT subject-area breakdown?

other-transactions-authoritydod-inspector-generalantigravityaatipaawsapunverified

claim-ac-gravity-aawsap-not-same-funding-mechanism-nor-found-in-watchdog-material carries an [unverified] flag on its "visible outlier" framing: no GAO, CRS, or DoD IG document found this session names AC Gravity, AATIP, or AAWSAP, but two directly relevant DoD Inspector General audits were not independently read — only noted as further leads in the originating capture:

• DODIG-2021-077 (April 2021) — consortium OT compliance, examined a $24.6B sample, FY2018–2019.
• DODIG-2022-127 (September 2022) — prototype OT / nontraditional- contractor compliance.

What to pull

1. Both reports, likely hosted at media.defense.gov — which returned HTTP 403 to extract_pdf and WebFetch alike on the originating capture's attempt (2026-10-18). Try a Wayback Machine capture first, per the vault's Wayback-first convention for other known-blocked hosts.
2. Search each for "AC Gravity," "AATIP," "AAWSAP," and "antigravity" — a genuine negative result here (rather than an unattempted search) is itself the finding that would let the null result in the linked claim-note stand on more than an absence-of-search.
3. Note whether either report contains its own technology-area or subject-area breakdown of OT obligations — a second, independent data point against claim-gao-2022-ot-consortia-breakdown-shows-conventional-categories-not-fringe-physics.

Why it matters

The linked claim-note's null result ("no document found this session names AC Gravity or AATIP") is currently a search-coverage finding, not a confirmed negative — it's unclear whether the absence is because these two cases genuinely don't appear in DoD IG material, or because the two most likely documents to mention them were never actually opened.

Progress log

• 2026-10-19 — both reports were fetched and read in full this session (Wayback Machine capture for DODIG-2021-077; oversight.gov PDF mirror for DODIG-2022-127 after a corrupted Wayback capture). Settled by claim-dodig-2021-077-dodig-2022-127-no-mention-of-ac-gravity-aatip-aawsap (neither name appears anywhere in either document, upgrading the prior unread absence-of-search to a confirmed absence) and claim-dodig-audits-organize-by-compliance-category-not-subject-area (neither report contains a subject-area breakdown; both organize findings by compliance category, corroborating GAO's table as the only such breakdown assembled).