Does GAO-22-105357's own consortium-level lists (Table 4, Appendix II) name AC Gravity, AATIP, or AAWSAP anywhere?
claim-ac-gravity-aawsap-not-same-funding-mechanism-nor-found-in-watchdog-material
carries an [unverified] flag: no source located in that session's search named
AC Gravity, AATIP, or AAWSAP in any GAO, CRS, or DoD Inspector General document.
The two most relevant DoD IG audits have since been read in full and confirmed
negative (see claim-dodig-2021-077-dodig-2022-127-no-mention-of-ac-gravity-aatip-aawsap),
but GAO-22-105357 itself — now fully in hand as a 75-page PDF via a Wayback
Machine capture (source_sha: c97a2c6b378376e45f117d774bc5ea68b9f208abf653327d1bead4c80751c03d)
— has two sections that were not read this session and are the one place a
consortium-level (rather than technology-area-level) name would appear:
What to pull
- Table 4 ("Selected Department of Defense Consortia and Associated Technology Areas," p. 43) — a named list of individual consortia, not just technology-area totals.
- Appendix II ("List of Consortia that Received Department of Defense Other Transaction Agreement Awards, Fiscal Years 2019–2021," p. 58) — the full consortium-level roster behind Figure 5's technology-area totals.
- Search both for "AC Gravity," "AATIP," "AAWSAP," and "antigravity."
The same Wayback snapshot that produced this capture's quotes should still be
reachable by the same route (raw-bytes id_ modifier against the archived
gao.gov PDF URL) — gao.gov's own hosting remains known-blocked per sources.md.
Why it matters
This is the most direct remaining test of whether AC Gravity (a documented, named OT awardee) or AATIP/AAWSAP registers anywhere in GAO's own consortium accounting, closing the one gap claim-ac-gravity-aawsap-not-same-funding-mechanism-nor-found-in-watchdog-material's flag still names now that the DoD IG side is settled.
Progress log
- 2026-10-20 — claim-gao-22-105357-table4-appendix2-no-mention-ac-gravity-aatip-aawsap read both Table 4 and Appendix II's Table 7 directly (the same Wayback-recovered PDF, identical sha256) and, beyond them, the full 75-page extracted text; none of the four search strings occurs anywhere. Settled it: there was no consortium-level name left unchecked.