citation-network

5 notes carry this tag — 3 claims, 2 observations. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Lieder & Griffiths (2020) cite Oaksford & Chater's 2007 Bayesian Rationality in a five-work psychology background list — a third, thinner citation alongside the 1994 and 1999 papers

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bayesian-cognition, cognitive-science
The cosine-0.85 pairing between Oaksford & Chater's uncertainty-redefinition of rationality and resource-rational analysis's utility-minus-cost formalism is a real but genealogical bridge, not a direct engagement

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bayesian-cognition, cross-domain-bridge
Lieder & Griffiths (2020) cite Oaksford & Chater's 1994 optimal-data-selection paper by name as a worked example of how rational analysis explains apparent bias

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, bayesian-cognition
Lieder & Griffiths (2020) cite Chater & Oaksford's 1999 retrospective, not Anderson (1990) alone, when naming 'rational analysis' as the paradigm resource-rational analysis extends

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, anderson, cognitive-science
The cosine-0.85 pairing between the vault's Oaksford-Chater Wason-task claim and its resource-rational-analysis formalism claim is a confirmed bridge — a direct citation link, not shared ancestry

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, cross-domain-bridge