all tags

citation-practice

15 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 6 claims, 2 observations, 1 question, 2 captures, 2 myths, 1 essay. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Essays

• 
  filed under medical example
  essay drafting 2026-08-13 · RAG, machine-learning-theory, voting-theory, crowdsourcing, medical-statistics

Everything else

• Besombes & Révault d'Allonnes (2008), read in full, builds its information-scoring method as a named extension of STANAG 2022 — citing the standard directly by number and edition
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Ulicny, Matheus, Powell & Kokar (2010), read in full, cites STANAG 2022 Edition 8 directly as a numbered reference and devotes two sections to critiquing it as inadequate for networked warfare
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Do the FUSION / NATO-RTO information-fusion papers named by ONERA (2012) actually cite STANAG directly, when read in the original rather than through ONERA's characterization?
  capture promoted 2026-10-26 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Does any information-fusion, intelligence-analysis, or RAG-provenance paper actually cite NATO source-grading doctrine (Admiralty Code / STANAG 2511)?
  capture promoted 2026-10-24 · information-fusion, intelligence-analysis, RAG, provenance, Admiralty-code
• Classical information-fusion research cites NATO's STANAG doctrine explicitly, by number — the two-axis source model is inherited there, not independently rediscovered
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · information-fusion, intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, provenance, admiralty-code
• NATO source-grading doctrine has a real citation lineage into information fusion and intelligence-analysis psychology — but it appears to stop before the RAG/LLM retrieval literature
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · source-evaluation, RAG, provenance, admiralty-code, STANAG
• Do the FUSION / NATO-RTO information-fusion papers named by ONERA (2012) actually cite STANAG directly, when read in the original rather than through ONERA's characterization?
  question open 2026-10-24 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Hinton's 2022 Forward-Forward paper cites 'Rumelhart et al., 1986' as bare shorthand for backpropagation — a live instance of the anchoring effect the 1986-demonstration claim names
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-09-19 · hinton, backpropagation, forward-forward, rumelhart, history-of-ml
• A phrase is not a pedigree — 'weighted (majority) voting' names several unrelated machines, and the real lineages run somewhere else
  topic map 2026-08-14 · voting-theory, machine-learning-theory, multiple-discovery, citation-practice, crowdsourcing
• RA-RAG's 2025 'weighted majority voting' cites neither Condorcet nor Littlestone & Warmuth — but it does inherit WMV from the crowdsourcing literature (Li & Yu 2014)
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-10 · RAG, machine-learning-theory, voting-theory, multiple-discovery, source-evaluation
• Icard's 2024 paper adds a full qualitative best-to-worse ranking of the nine message types that is absent from his 2023 taxonomy original
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-09 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, taxonomy
• The phrase 'credit-assignment' in Minsky & Papert's Perceptrons appears only in the 1988 Expanded Edition's Epilogue defending Rosenblatt — not in the 1969 original
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-09 · perceptrons, minsky-papert, credit-assignment, terminology, history-of-ml
• Myth ledger: "LeCun's 1988 paper used hand-designed convolutional kernels" — the 1988 hand-designed-kernel ZIP-code paper was Denker et al., not LeCun
  note budding Tier 1 2026-07-09 · lecun, denker, bell-labs, convolutional-neural-networks, backpropagation
• Myth ledger: "the structural credit-assignment problem comes from Minsky (1961)"
  note budding Tier 1 2026-07-09 · credit-assignment, structural-credit-assignment, minsky, sutton, terminology