citation-verification

12 notes carry this tag — 7 claims, 1 question, 4 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Does Stroud's 2022 Pluralist article's China-comparison opening survive verbatim into the 2023 book, and does the book's own bibliography cite China-side Dewey scholarship (Wang 2005, Keenan, Behuniak, Schwartz)?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-11 · john-dewey, hu-shih, b-r-ambedkar, scott-stroud, china
Google Books' search-index of Stroud's 2023 book locates 'Hu Shih' and 'Ching-Sze Wang' by page number, but finds no hit for Keenan, Behuniak, or Schwartz

claim seedling Tier 3 2026-09-11 · scott-stroud, hu-shih, china, india, jessica-ching-sze-wang
Stroud's 2023 book on Ambedkar and Dewey has no standalone bibliography — citations sit in endnotes ('Notes'), not a separate reference list

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-11 · scott-stroud, b-r-ambedkar, john-dewey, bibliography, citation-verification
Did Hubert Dreyfus actually cite Michael Polanyi's tacit-knowledge epistemology as an influence on his AI critique, or is that only a Wikipedia editorial gloss?

capture promoted 2026-09-10 · michael-polanyi, hubert-dreyfus, tacit-knowledge, ai-critique, philosophy-of-ai
Dreyfus's 1972 What Computers Can't Do directly names, quotes, and cites Michael Polanyi — alongside Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty — as a source for its embodied/tacit-skill argument

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-10 · michael-polanyi, hubert-dreyfus, tacit-knowledge, ai-critique, philosophy-of-ai
Does Nicholas Agar's 1998/2004 'liberal eugenics' writing cite or engage Robert Nozick's 'genetic supermarket' directly, or is the link a later commentator's framing?

capture promoted Tier 2 2026-09-09 · nicholas-agar, robert-nozick, liberal-eugenics, genetic-supermarket, citation-verification
Per Hauskeller's review, Agar's 'method of moral images' grounds liberal eugenics without invoking any prior political-philosophical framework, Nozick's entitlement theory included

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-09-09 · nicholas-agar, liberal-eugenics, robert-nozick, methodology, citation-verification
The two secondary works most often used to connect Nozick's 'genetic supermarket' and Agar's 'liberal eugenics' cite them separately — adjacent footnotes in one, different sections in the other — not as a citation chain

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-09-09 · nicholas-agar, robert-nozick, liberal-eugenics, genetic-supermarket, citation-verification
Two independent, detailed reviews of Agar's 2004 book Liberal Eugenics never mention Nozick or the 'genetic supermarket' anywhere in their summaries of its argument

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-09-09 · nicholas-agar, robert-nozick, liberal-eugenics, genetic-supermarket, citation-verification
Does Nicholas Agar's 1998/2004 'liberal eugenics' writing cite or engage Robert Nozick's 'genetic supermarket' directly, or is the link a later commentator's framing?

question open 2026-09-08 · nicholas-agar, robert-nozick, liberal-eugenics, genetic-supermarket, citation-verification
Brooks's 1986 predecessor memo to "Intelligence Without Representation" cites Dreyfus twice by name and frames its entire argument as a rebuttal to him

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
Does any secondary source document an acknowledged Brooks–Dreyfus link, or does the "lineage" live entirely in later commentators reading the two same-titled papers side by side?

capture promoted 2026-07-13 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation