quote-provenance

32 notes carry this tag — 16 claims, 5 questions, 10 captures, 1 myth. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

RIKER's widely-cited '7.9% to 96.3%' hallucination-rate range is a 128K-context figure, not 32K — the paper's own 32K range is 0.0%-93.2%

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-22 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, quote-provenance
Does Roberts's primary 1988 Bartee chapter — or the blocked CBI OH 159 oral history — confirm the Gilliam-quoted fragments are really his, and really on the pages cited?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-19 · larry-roberts, bartee-1988, licklider, cbi-oh159, mansfield-amendment
Gilliam's unquoted 'oral history' aside about Roberts's DARPA budget, previously unverifiable, matches CBI OH 159's actual content once the transcript was read directly

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-10-19 · larry-roberts, gilliam-2025, cbi-oh159, mansfield-amendment, quote-provenance
CBI OH 159, recovered for the first time via a Wayback Machine snapshot, does not contain the Gilliam-quoted Mansfield-Amendment fragment attributed to Roberts's 1988 Bartee chapter

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-19 · larry-roberts, bartee-1988, cbi-oh159, mansfield-amendment, quote-provenance
Does Larry Roberts's own primary writing (1988 chapter or oral history) corroborate Werbos's DARPA 'crisis warning' account, and does it settle the misattributed-quote correction?

capture promoted 2026-10-18 · larry-roberts, paul-werbos, darpa, ipto, mansfield-amendment
Does Roberts's primary 1988 Bartee chapter — or the blocked CBI OH 159 oral history — confirm the Gilliam-quoted fragments are really his, and really on the pages cited?

question open 2026-10-18 · larry-roberts, bartee-1988, licklider, cbi-oh159, quote-provenance
Do Talagrand's 2018 ECMWF slides 3 and 8 actually say what Cali's review quotes — Le Dimet's 'documents... based on adjoint equations,' the Kontarev seminar attribution, and Penenko & Obraztsov (1976) predating the 1986 paper?

question answered 2026-10-15 · automatic-differentiation, meteorology, data-assimilation, adjoint-method, quote-provenance
Aikins's 1902 index and full text contain no "Machine," "Boole," "Piano," or "Mechanical" entries tied to Jevons — an absence that, per Cali's review and an independent 2026-10-12 re-sweep, holds across the captured text, not just the index

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-11 · herbert-austin-aikins, william-stanley-jevons, logic-piano, argument-from-silence, quote-provenance
Jevons's own pedagogical textbook, Elementary Lessons in Logic, describes the Logic Piano in Lesson XXIII (pp.191–201) — sixty to seventy pages past the lessons Aikins quotes to the page

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-11 · william-stanley-jevons, herbert-austin-aikins, logic-piano, history-of-logic, quote-provenance
Jevons's own pedagogical logic textbook describes the Logic Piano; Aikins (1902), who quotes that same textbook by page number while rejecting rule-following, never engages with the machine — scope mismatch within one book, not chronological irrelevance

capture promoted 2026-10-07 · jevons, herbert-austin-aikins, logic-piano, argument-from-silence, mcgrew
Which of Jevons's own logic texts supplies the 'p. 82'/'p. 83' conversion rules and the eight numbered 'rules of the syllogism' Aikins quotes in his 1902 Principles of Logic?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-01 · william-stanley-jevons, herbert-austin-aikins, syllogism, conversion, quote-provenance
The 1881 printing's own table of contents independently fixes Elementary Lessons in Logic's pagination (Lesson X at p.81, Lesson XV at p.126), consistent with the page numbers Aikins cites in 1902

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-01 · william-stanley-jevons, herbert-austin-aikins, quote-provenance, history-of-logic, bibliography
Jevons's Elementary Lessons in Logic, Lesson X (pp.81–87), is the text behind Aikins's "Jevons, p. 82" and "Jevons, p. 83" conversion-rule citations

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-01 · william-stanley-jevons, herbert-austin-aikins, syllogism, conversion, quote-provenance
Jevons's Elementary Lessons in Logic, Lesson XV, "The Rules of the Syllogism" (pp.126–131), is the text behind the eight numbered rules Aikins reproduces in his Ch. XVI footnote

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-01 · william-stanley-jevons, herbert-austin-aikins, syllogism, quote-provenance, history-of-logic
Aikins's own 1902 syllogism-rule chapters (Ch. XI, XVI) quote and contest Jevons's stated rules directly, independent of the jingle-fallacy chapter

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-30 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, william-stanley-jevons, syllogism, quote-provenance
In Chapter XI of his 1902 Principles of Logic, Aikins quotes Jevons's stated conversion rules verbatim with page citations, then argues in his own words that no such rule can be followed 'blindly'

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-30 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, william-stanley-jevons, syllogism, conversion
In Chapter XVI of his 1902 Principles of Logic, Aikins reproduces Jevons's eight numbered 'rules of the syllogism' verbatim in a footnote, then dismisses mechanical rule-following as inferior to his own interpretive method

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-30 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, william-stanley-jevons, syllogism, quote-provenance
Which of Jevons's own logic texts supplies the 'p. 82'/'p. 83' conversion rules and the eight numbered 'rules of the syllogism' Aikins quotes in his 1902 Principles of Logic?

question answered 2026-09-30 · herbert-austin-aikins, william-stanley-jevons, syllogism, quote-provenance, history-of-logic
A full read of Aikins's 1902 Principles of Logic finds the word "jingle" confined to one contiguous passage of Chapter XVIII (pp.193–195, seven occurrences), with the book's own index pointing at the naming page, 194

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-26 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, quote-provenance, full-text-read, scope
Aikins, in Chapter XVIII of his 1902 Principles of Logic, proposes naming a class of fallacies "the... jingle Fallacies" — in his own voice, inside the one passage (pp.193–195) that holds all the book's uses of the word

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-26 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, quote-provenance, citation-provenance
Does the word "jingle" appear anywhere in Aikins's 1902 Principles of Logic outside the read Ch. II passage?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-18 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, quote-provenance, verification, edward-thorndike
Thorndike's 1904 primary text attributes the 'jingle' fallacy to 'Professor Aikins,' not to himself — and Aikins's own 1902 book doesn't use the word in the matching passage

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-17 · jingle-fallacy, edward-thorndike, herbert-austin-aikins, psychometrics, citation-provenance
Aikins's 1902 chapter on "paronymous terms" discusses the jingle-fallacy phenomenon at length without using the word "jingle," in the portion read

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-17 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, quote-provenance, partial-read
Thorndike's 1904 primary text attributes the "jingle" fallacy to "Professor Aikins," not to himself

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-17 · jingle-fallacy, edward-thorndike, herbert-austin-aikins, psychometrics, citation-provenance
Does the word "jingle" appear anywhere in Aikins's 1902 Principles of Logic outside the read Ch. II passage?

question answered 2026-09-17 · jingle-fallacy, herbert-austin-aikins, quote-provenance, verification
Read Kung's 1982 'Why Systolic Architectures?' directly and confirm the cardiac/heart-pumping quote attributed to it

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-12 · systolic-array, kung, etymology, verification, quote-provenance
Kung's 1982 paper independently frames the whole systolic dataflow — not just the memory — as analogous to blood circulating through the heart

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-12 · systolic-array, kung, cardiac-metaphor, etymology, hardware
Myth ledger: "the function of a processor is analogous to that of the heart... every processor regularly pumps data in and out" — genuine Kung & Leiserson (1978), routinely misattributed to Kung 1982

note budding Tier 1 2026-08-12 · myth, systolic-array, kung, cardiac-metaphor, quote-provenance
Does the sentence 'an inappropriate and misleading measure of individual research, especially if used for tenure and promotion' belong to Brian D. Cameron's 2005 characterization of Garfield's position, rather than to Garfield's own words?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, cameron
Cameron (2005), not Garfield, authored the widely repeated 'inappropriate and misleading measure of individual research... tenure and promotion' sentence

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, cameron
Does the sentence 'an inappropriate and misleading measure of individual research, especially if used for tenure and promotion' belong to Brian D. Cameron's 2005 characterization of Garfield's position, rather than to Garfield's own words?

question answered 2026-08-07 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, source-criticism
Verify the Foroughi & Al-Amoudi (2020) 'unusable/uprooted' quote against direct-fetched primary text (2026-08-03 attempt)

capture promoted Tier 3 2026-08-03 · organizational-forgetting, collective-memory, source-verification, primary-source-verification, quote-provenance