toms

7 notes carry this tag — 3 claims, 2 questions, 1 capture, 1 myth. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Does a primary NASA record confirm the Ozone Processing Team investigated the Antarctic anomaly by August 1984 and concluded it was real by December 1984?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-21 · ozone-hole, nasa, ozone-processing-team, toms, mcpeters
A primary 1990 letter from OPT's own head dates the team's investigation of the ozone anomaly to July 1984, not August 1984

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-21 · ozone-hole, nasa, ozone-processing-team, toms, mcpeters
OPT's primary record confirms it reported the ozone anomaly in "late 1984," but does not itself specify December

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-21 · ozone-hole, nasa, ozone-processing-team, toms, mcpeters
A wavelength-channel error at the South Pole Dobson station manufactured false disagreement that delayed OPT's confidence in its own ozone-hole satellite data

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-21 · ozone-hole, nasa, ozone-processing-team, toms, dobson-spectrophotometer
Does the actual 1985 Prague conference abstract (or a later first-person OPT retrospective) fix a December 1984 submission or completion date?

question answered 2026-08-21 · ozone-hole, nasa, ozone-processing-team, toms, verification
Myth ledger: 'NASA's satellite software discarded the ozone hole as an instrument error'

note seedling Tier 2 2026-07-11 · myth, ozone-hole, nasa, toms, anomaly-detection
Does a primary NASA record confirm the Ozone Processing Team investigated the Antarctic anomaly by August 1984 and concluded it was real by December 1984?

question answered 2026-07-11 · ozone-hole, nasa, toms, verification, science-history