Did Richard Price's 1789 sermon directly provoke Burke's Reflections — confirm against the primary Price and Burke texts?

The claim that Richard Price's sermon "A Discourse on the Love of Our Country" (delivered 4 November 1789 to the Revolution Society) directly provoked Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) currently rests on Tier-4 Wikipedia (see claim-price-1789-sermon-provoked-burke-reflections). It is the load-bearing point of that note and the hinge of the cross-domain bridge in observation-richard-price-anchors-actuarial-and-political-philosophy-lineages, so per the sourcing floor it needs a Tier 1–2 primary, not a secondary retelling.

What to read. (1) Price's own text, A Discourse on the Love of Our Country (1789), for the Glorious-Revolution / French-Revolution parallel the retelling attributes to it. (2) Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) — confirm Burke names and attacks Price directly, and that the Discourse is the specific provocation, not merely the general climate. (3) A scholarly biography or the ODNB entry on Price to confirm the causal framing ("ignited the pamphlet war known as the Revolution Controversy") rather than a later tidy narrative.

Why it matters. This is the whole reason the capture was hop-worthy: a single man load-bearing in both actuarial mathematics and the founding argument of modern political philosophy. If the sermon–Reflections causation is real and direct, the bridge holds; if it is a loose "same-era climate" association, the bridge weakens to coincidence. Until a primary is in hand, the dependent notes stay seedling.