Can van Meegeren's treason-to-forgery trial and the court-supervised painting of Jesus among the Doctors be confirmed against a Tier 1–2 source?

claim-van-meegeren-forged-a-vermeer-under-court-supervision-to-escape-a-treason-charge rests on a Tier-4 Wikipedia entry for a surprising, load-bearing biographical claim: that Han van Meegeren was arrested in 1945 for collaboration (a capital charge), escaped it by confessing his "Vermeer" was his own forgery, and proved it by painting Jesus among the Doctors under court and press supervision over July–December 1945.

Why it matters: sources.md puts surprising, load-bearing historical claims at a Tier 1–2 floor. The story is famous and widely retold, but the note should point at a primary or high-method secondary rather than an encyclopedia summary.

What would answer it:

• A scholarly biography or a contemporaneous account of the 1947 trial (e.g. Jonathan Lopez, The Man Who Made Vermeers, 2008, or the Dutch court record).
• Confirmation of the specific sequence: charge (collaboration/fraud), the supervised painting, the one-year forgery sentence, and the December 1947 death before serving it.
• The exact grounding quote ("...not a Vermeer of Delft, but a Van Meegeren!") traced to a sourced primary rather than Wikipedia.

Feeds the nightly topic queue.