all tags

admiralty-code

39 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 18 claims, 5 observations, 3 questions, 12 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Besombes & Révault d'Allonnes (2008), read in full, builds its information-scoring method as a named extension of STANAG 2022 — citing the standard directly by number and edition
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Ulicny, Matheus, Powell & Kokar (2010), read in full, cites STANAG 2022 Edition 8 directly as a numbered reference and devotes two sections to critiquing it as inadequate for networked warfare
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Do the FUSION / NATO-RTO information-fusion papers named by ONERA (2012) actually cite STANAG directly, when read in the original rather than through ONERA's characterization?
  capture promoted 2026-10-26 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Does any information-fusion, intelligence-analysis, or RAG-provenance paper actually cite NATO source-grading doctrine (Admiralty Code / STANAG 2511)?
  capture promoted 2026-10-24 · information-fusion, intelligence-analysis, RAG, provenance, Admiralty-code
• Classical information-fusion research cites NATO's STANAG doctrine explicitly, by number — the two-axis source model is inherited there, not independently rediscovered
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · information-fusion, intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, provenance, admiralty-code
• NATO source-grading doctrine has a real citation lineage into information fusion and intelligence-analysis psychology — but it appears to stop before the RAG/LLM retrieval literature
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · source-evaluation, RAG, provenance, admiralty-code, STANAG
• Do the FUSION / NATO-RTO information-fusion papers named by ONERA (2012) actually cite STANAG directly, when read in the original rather than through ONERA's characterization?
  question open 2026-10-24 · information-fusion, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, STANAG, citation-practice
• Sherman Kent's 1964 'Words of Estimative Probability' proposes a single-dimension words-to-odds scale, with no axis for source honesty or reliability
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-06 · intelligence-tradecraft, estimative-probability, sherman-kent, source-evaluation, primary-source-verification
• Who was John Godfrey, and does his own account explain the Admiralty Code's independent convergence with Quellenkritik?
  capture promoted 2026-09-28 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, godfrey, historiography, quellenkritik
• Godfrey's catalogued NID-era papers at the Caird Library show no documented contact with diplomatics or historical source criticism
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-28 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, godfrey, historiography, quellenkritik
• Godfrey's own account of the NID grading scheme survives only as un-digitized archival material at the Caird Library and Churchill Archives Centre
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-28 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, godfrey, historiography, archival-record
• Godfrey served as Director of the Naval Intelligence Division from February 1939 to November 1942
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-28 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, godfrey, naval-intelligence, biography
• Room 39 (1968) at the primary vs. Godfrey's 1939 Admiralty-Code origin story — primary unreachable; Samet (1975) silent on origin
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-24 · admiralty-code, intelligence-tradecraft, godfrey, mclachlan, samet
• Block's 2021 page puts only one word — 'intolerable' — in McLachlan's mouth; the 1939 date, 'anarchy' framing and A1–D5 range are Block's own uncited prose
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-09-24 · admiralty-code, godfrey, mclachlan, historiography, verification
• The McLachlan passage Block quotes uses an 'E' grade, in tension with Block's own 'A1 to D5' description of the wartime scale
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-09-24 · admiralty-code, godfrey, mclachlan, samet, verification
• The Admiralty Code's 1939 origin has no contact with diplomatics — the seed's cosine-linked pair is convergent evolution, not shared descent
  capture promoted Tier 3 2026-09-23 · cross-domain-bridge, cross-time-bridge, source-evaluation, intelligence-tradecraft, diplomatics
• What connects the intelligence-doctrine/RAG two-axis source model and Gates's diplomatics-cluster authentication (cosine 0.85, unlinked)
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-23 · bridge-investigation, historiography, source-criticism, diplomatics, quellenkritik
• Godfrey, as Director of the Naval Intelligence Division in 1939, had the Admiralty Code's source/information split devised to end 'the anarchy of different information reports'
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-09-23 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, source-evaluation, historiography, godfrey
• The Admiralty Code's 1939 wartime origin and diplomatics's evidentiary method arose independently — the resemblance the vault flagged at cosine 0.85 is convergent evolution, not shared descent
  observation seedling Tier 3 2026-09-23 · cross-domain-bridge, cross-time-bridge, source-evaluation, intelligence-tradecraft, diplomatics
• Does McLachlan's Room 39 (1968), read at the primary, confirm Godfrey's 1939 Admiralty-Code origin story — and does Samet (1975) corroborate or complicate it?
  question open 2026-09-23 · admiralty-code, intelligence-tradecraft, verification, historiography, godfrey
• Bipartite hop: does the intelligence-doctrine/RAG two-axis source model actually connect to the Gates-Altair/Mabillon diplomatics cluster (cosine 0.85, unlinked)?
  capture promoted Tier 3 2026-09-22 · bridge-investigation, diplomatics, documentary-source-criticism, intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation
• What actually connects the Gates/Mabillon diplomatics-cluster note and the intelligence-doctrine/RAG two-axis note (cosine 0.85, unlinked)
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-19 · bridge-investigation, diplomatics, documentary-source-criticism, historiography, intelligence-tradecraft
• What genuinely connects Kelly et al. (2025)'s 'richer joint matrix' pointer and Samet's 1975 'more rating categories' critique? Real citation link, opposite prescription
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-18 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, source-evaluation, epistemics, rating-scales
• The Kelly et al. (2025)/Samet (1975) 'more rating categories' cosine pairing (0.87) is a genuine citation link, but the two sources prescribe opposite structural moves on axis count
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-18 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, source-evaluation, epistemics, rating-scales
• Samet's 1975 critique of the Admiralty Code argued for more rating categories, not fewer — citing Bendig (1954) that a nine-point scale transmits more information than a five-point one
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, information-theory, psychophysics
• In Samet's 1975 study, 31 of 37 officers blamed their own skill rather than the rating scale for evaluation errors that the study's own data traced to the scale
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, cognitive-bias, self-attribution
• In Samet's 1975 Admiralty Code test, three-fourths of officers treated the reliability rating as correlated with accuracy rather than as an independent dimension
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, cognitive-bias, epistemics
• The Admiralty Code's six-level scales sit in the same information-theoretic lineage as the question of how many categories absolute judgment can carry — Miller (1956) through Bendig (1954) to Samet (1975)
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · cross-time-bridge, information-theory, psychophysics, intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation
• Can the 'one-third of cases ambiguous or inconsistent' figure Kelly et al. (2025) attribute to Samet (1975) be located in Samet's original text?
  question answered 2026-08-15 · source-evaluation, admiralty-code, verification, intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics
• Miller's 1956 'channel capacity of absolute judgment' is the buried information-theoretic reason a 1975 Army report argued the Admiralty Code's rating scales were too coarse
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-11 · intelligence-tradecraft, information-theory, psychophysics, epistemics, source-evaluation
• The two axes that won't stay independent — five fields split trust-in-the-source from trust-in-the-message, and the split keeps leaking
  topic map 2026-08-10 · source-evaluation, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, RAG
• Does Icard's own 2023 Intellectica article match the nine-category Honesty×Truth taxonomy as reproduced in his 2024 arXiv paper's Table 6?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-09 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, admiralty-code
• Benjamin Icard's dynamic logic resolves the reliability/credibility independence problem by abandoning independence — reliability updates credibility rather than sitting beside it as a second axis
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-07 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, dynamic-epistemic-logic
• Icard's 2023 taxonomy crosses source Honesty with content Truth to yield nine named message types, from information to objective lie
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-08-07 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, admiralty-code
• Icard's 2024 dynamic logic resolves the reliability/credibility independence problem by abandoning independence — credibility becomes primary, reliability a dynamic update operator on it
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-07 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, dynamic-epistemic-logic
• Kelly et al. (2025), after reviewing evidence that raters can't keep reliability and credibility apart, point to a richer joint matrix rather than collapsing the two axes
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code
• A search for practitioner commentary on the Admiralty Code found writers arguing to keep reliability and credibility separate, and none arguing to merge them
  observation seedling Tier 3 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code
• The Admiralty Code grades every intelligence report on two axes meant to be independent — source reliability (A–F) and information credibility (1–6)
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-07-11 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, provenance, admiralty-code, epistemics
• Evaluators cannot keep source reliability and information credibility independent — they avoid inconsistent pairings and over-weight the source's track record
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-11 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, epistemics, cognitive-bias, admiralty-code