all tags

admiralty-code

17 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 8 claims, 3 observations, 1 question, 4 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• What genuinely connects Kelly et al. (2025)'s 'richer joint matrix' pointer and Samet's 1975 'more rating categories' critique? Real citation link, opposite prescription
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-18 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, source-evaluation, epistemics, rating-scales
• The Kelly et al. (2025)/Samet (1975) 'more rating categories' cosine pairing (0.87) is a genuine citation link, but the two sources prescribe opposite structural moves on axis count
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-18 · intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, source-evaluation, epistemics, rating-scales
• Samet's 1975 critique of the Admiralty Code argued for more rating categories, not fewer — citing Bendig (1954) that a nine-point scale transmits more information than a five-point one
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, information-theory, psychophysics
• In Samet's 1975 study, 31 of 37 officers blamed their own skill rather than the rating scale for evaluation errors that the study's own data traced to the scale
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, cognitive-bias, self-attribution
• In Samet's 1975 Admiralty Code test, three-fourths of officers treated the reliability rating as correlated with accuracy rather than as an independent dimension
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, admiralty-code, cognitive-bias, epistemics
• The Admiralty Code's six-level scales sit in the same information-theoretic lineage as the question of how many categories absolute judgment can carry — Miller (1956) through Bendig (1954) to Samet (1975)
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · cross-time-bridge, information-theory, psychophysics, intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation
• Can the 'one-third of cases ambiguous or inconsistent' figure Kelly et al. (2025) attribute to Samet (1975) be located in Samet's original text?
  question answered 2026-08-15 · source-evaluation, admiralty-code, verification, intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics
• Miller's 1956 'channel capacity of absolute judgment' is the buried information-theoretic reason a 1975 Army report argued the Admiralty Code's rating scales were too coarse
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-11 · intelligence-tradecraft, information-theory, psychophysics, epistemics, source-evaluation
• The two axes that won't stay independent — five fields split trust-in-the-source from trust-in-the-message, and the split keeps leaking
  topic map 2026-08-10 · source-evaluation, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code, RAG
• Does Icard's own 2023 Intellectica article match the nine-category Honesty×Truth taxonomy as reproduced in his 2024 arXiv paper's Table 6?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-09 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, admiralty-code
• Benjamin Icard's dynamic logic resolves the reliability/credibility independence problem by abandoning independence — reliability updates credibility rather than sitting beside it as a second axis
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-07 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, dynamic-epistemic-logic
• Icard's 2023 taxonomy crosses source Honesty with content Truth to yield nine named message types, from information to objective lie
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-08-07 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, admiralty-code
• Icard's 2024 dynamic logic resolves the reliability/credibility independence problem by abandoning independence — credibility becomes primary, reliability a dynamic update operator on it
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-07 · intelligence-tradecraft, epistemics, source-evaluation, formal-logic, dynamic-epistemic-logic
• Kelly et al. (2025), after reviewing evidence that raters can't keep reliability and credibility apart, point to a richer joint matrix rather than collapsing the two axes
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code
• A search for practitioner commentary on the Admiralty Code found writers arguing to keep reliability and credibility separate, and none arguing to merge them
  observation seedling Tier 3 2026-07-21 · vault-design, source-tiers, epistemics, intelligence-tradecraft, admiralty-code
• The Admiralty Code grades every intelligence report on two axes meant to be independent — source reliability (A–F) and information credibility (1–6)
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-07-11 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, provenance, admiralty-code, epistemics
• Evaluators cannot keep source reliability and information credibility independent — they avoid inconsistent pairings and over-weight the source's track record
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-11 · intelligence-tradecraft, source-evaluation, epistemics, cognitive-bias, admiralty-code