all tags

historiography-of-ai

24 notes carry this tag — 10 claims, 3 observations, 4 questions, 7 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Jordanous's Dreyfus-as-precursor framing reads as a token of 'precursorism,' the named category — giving the Butterfield/Jordanous bridge a documented mechanism rather than a surface analogy
  observation seedling Tier 2 2026-10-03 · whig-history, precursorism, butterfield, jardine, jordanous
• Is Jordanous's 'precursor' framing of Dreyfus an instance of the inference Butterfield's Whig history names? A mechanism link, with a scope limit
  capture promoted 2026-09-24 · whig-history, precursor, anachronism, butterfield, jordanous
• Precursorism names the mechanism bridging Butterfield's Whig history and Jordanous's Dreyfus-as-precursor-to-Brooks framing
  capture promoted 2026-09-23 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, historiography-of-science, presentism, precursorism
• What genuinely connects Schmidhuber's 'Annotated History' prolepsis and Nicely's 2011 FAQ memory-reconstruction caveat?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-22 · bridge-check, schmidhuber, thomas-nicely, whig-history, historiography-of-ai
• The 0.88 cosine pairing between Schmidhuber's unhedged Leibniz prolepsis and Nicely's self-flagged memory-reconstruction caveat is not an evidentiary bridge, but names a real contrast in epistemic self-labeling
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-09-22 · bridge-check, schmidhuber, thomas-nicely, whig-history, historiography-of-ai
• Does the Butterfield/Weinberg defensible-vs-anachronistic split actually hold when tested against every entry in the vault's myth-ledger?
  capture promoted 2026-09-04 · whig-history, myth-ledger, historiography-of-ai, butterfield, weinberg
• Weinberg's science exemption and Wikipedia's summary of Butterfield's own critique both explicitly name and reject hero/villain historical narratives, not only anachronistic concept-importing
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-09-04 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, presentism, weinberg, butterfield
• Do Schmidhuber's arXiv:2212.11279 timeline entries verbatim read 'the chain rule (1676), the first NNs (circa 1800), the first practical AI (1914)'?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-29 · schmidhuber, whig-history, historiography-of-ai, verification, history-of-ml
• Schmidhuber states the 1914 Torres y Quevedo 'first practical AI' claim unhedged, unlike a comparable priority claim he hedges elsewhere in the same paper
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-29 · schmidhuber, torres-y-quevedo, whig-history, historiography-of-ai, priority-dispute
• Schmidhuber's oft-quoted 'chain rule (1676)…' timeline phrase is drawn from his Abstract's summary sentence, not from the paper's own section headings
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-29 · schmidhuber, whig-history, historiography-of-ai, history-of-ml, quote-check
• What does Michael Mahoney's own 'The Histories of Computing(s)' (2005) actually argue about Whig history in computing?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-18 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, history-of-computing, mahoney, presentism
• Mahoney's 2005 essay never uses the term 'Whig history' or cites Butterfield — its critique is framed as anti-hype and anti-determinism, not an explicit Whig-history argument
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-18 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, history-of-computing, mahoney, presentism
• Mahoney frames machine-centred computing history as technological determinism ('impact theory') and argues for restoring human agency to the 'communities of computing'
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-18 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, history-of-computing, mahoney, technological-determinism
• Mahoney argues machine-centred computing history reads the computer's contingent path as inevitable because 'hype hides history'
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-18 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, history-of-computing, mahoney, presentism
• Do the vault's myth-ledger back-projection cases actually sort into Skinner's prolepsis vs. mythology of doctrines vs. coherence?
  question open 2026-07-27 · prolepsis, quentin-skinner, myth-ledger, historiography-of-ai, verification
• Herbert Butterfield's 1931 book defined 'Whig history' as the practice of studying the past with reference to the present
  claim seedling Tier 4 2026-07-12 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, presentism, philosophy-of-science, cross-domain-bridge
• Historian Michael S. Mahoney argued computing has no single history — only irreducibly plural 'histories' of the 'communities of computing' that shaped it
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, history-of-computing, mahoney, presentism
• Schmidhuber's 'Annotated History of Modern AI and Deep Learning' dates the field's origin to the 1676 chain rule and circa-1800 neural nets — reading the present category back onto the deep past
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, presentism, schmidhuber, credit-assignment
• Steven Weinberg argues Whig history is legitimate specifically for science, because scientific progress lets historians say who was right
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-07-12 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, presentism, philosophy-of-science, weinberg
• Butterfield/Weinberg's whig-history critique does not sort the vault's AI-history myth-ledger cleanly into two kinds — a hero/villain-narrative mode and a residual bibliometric/scope-conflation mode resist the binary
  observation seedling 2026-07-12 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, presentism, myth-ledger, philosophy-of-science
• What does Michael Mahoney's own 'The Histories of Computing(s)' (2005) actually argue about Whig history in computing?
  question answered 2026-07-12 · mahoney, whig-history, history-of-computing, verification, historiography-of-ai
• Do Schmidhuber's arXiv:2212.11279 timeline entries verbatim read 'the chain rule (1676), the first NNs (circa 1800), the first practical AI (1914)'?
  question answered 2026-07-12 · schmidhuber, whig-history, historiography-of-ai, verification, history-of-ml
• Does the Butterfield/Weinberg defensible-vs-anachronistic split actually hold when tested against every entry in the vault's myth-ledger?
  question answered 2026-07-12 · whig-history, myth-ledger, historiography-of-ai, verification, synthesis-check
• Whig history names what the vault's AI-history myth-ledger polices — and Weinberg's science exemption complicates it
  capture promoted Tier 2 2026-07-11 · whig-history, historiography-of-ai, presentism, credit-assignment, backpropagation