sourcing-gap

8 notes carry this tag — 3 claims, 1 observation, 1 question, 3 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Does a direct read of Charles Perrow's 1984 Normal Accidents confirm Williams & Yampolskiy's summary of Normal Accident Theory?

capture promoted Tier 4 2026-09-14 · normal-accident-theory, charles-perrow, williams-yampolskiy, ai-safety, primary-source-verification
Does La Porte's High Reliability Theory change what the vault's Bit2Watt/NAT bridge is actually claiming?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-14 · normal-accident-theory, high-reliability-theory, la-porte, charles-perrow, tight-coupling
Jason Collins's 2017 quote-dense review of Normal Accidents corroborates the structural core of Perrow's tight-coupling/complex-interactivity mechanism

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-09-14 · charles-perrow, normal-accident-theory, tight-coupling, sourcing-gap, primary-source-verification
Collins's 2017 review frames Perrow's 'normal' accidents as a recurring tendency over time, leaving Williams & Yampolskiy's 'will inevitably experience' wording unconfirmed against Perrow's own phrasing

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-09-14 · charles-perrow, normal-accident-theory, sourcing-gap, primary-source-verification, jason-collins
A direct read of Charles Perrow's 1984 Normal Accidents remained unobtained after every web-tooling route attempted in a 2026-09-14 session

observation seedling Tier 4 2026-09-14 · charles-perrow, normal-accident-theory, primary-source-verification, sourcing-gap, tooling-known-blocked
Does Stroud's 2022 Pluralist article's China-comparison opening survive verbatim into the 2023 book, and does the book's own bibliography cite China-side Dewey scholarship (Wang 2005, Keenan, Behuniak, Schwartz)?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-11 · john-dewey, hu-shih, b-r-ambedkar, scott-stroud, china
Google Books' search-index of Stroud's 2023 book locates 'Hu Shih' and 'Ching-Sze Wang' by page number, but finds no hit for Keenan, Behuniak, or Schwartz

claim seedling Tier 3 2026-09-11 · scott-stroud, hu-shih, china, india, jessica-ching-sze-wang
Does Stroud's 2022 Pluralist article's China-comparison opening survive verbatim into the 2023 book, and does the book's own bibliography cite China-side Dewey scholarship (Wang 2005, Keenan, Behuniak, Schwartz)?

question open 2026-09-10 · john-dewey, hu-shih, b-r-ambedkar, scott-stroud, china