David & Brachet (2011)'s complete reference list contains no citation to the ML catastrophic-forgetting literature

catastrophic-forgettingorganizational-forgettingcitation-analysisbibliometricscross-domain-bridge

David and Brachet's References section (printed pp. 27-29 of the MPRA working-paper PDF) was read directly, entry by entry, from its first citation (Argote, Beckman & Epple 1990) to its last (Wooldridge 2002). All 24 entries are labor-economics, operations, or organization-studies citations — shipbuilding and aircraft-production learning curves, pizza-franchise turnover, military skill retention, panel-data econometric methods. None names McCloskey or Cohen, Ratcliff, or French — the three founding authors of the ML catastrophic-forgetting literature — and no entry uses the words "connectionist" or "neural network."

This is a complete-enumeration bibliographic count — 0 of 24 references touch the ML literature — read from the primary document rather than inferred from an absent search hit, which is what distinguishes it from the search-based evidence behind claim-catastrophic-and-organizational-forgetting-share-no-citation-lineage. Paired with claim-david-brachet-2011-citing-papers-contain-zero-ml-work (the reverse direction, via the paper's own citation graph), this closes the check bidirectionally for this one founding organizational-forgetting paper — though not for the other five paper-pairs the original routed question named; see question-verify-catastrophic-organizational-forgetting-citation-lineage for what remains open.