all tags

oaksford-chater

25 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 9 claims, 5 observations, 10 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Dup-risk stub: the Oaksford & Chater (1994)-cited-as-worked-example note and resource-rational analysis's §5.4 yardstick-swap note are a confirmed real bridge, but a new claim-note would duplicate an already-saturated cluster
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-24 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, lieder-griffiths, wason-selection-task
• Chater & Oaksford's 1999 retrospective itself performs the 'swap the normative yardstick' move, recasting the Wason selection task as optimal data selection rather than logical falsification
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, bayesian-cognition, optimal-data-selection
• The pairing between Lieder & Griffiths's 1999 name-citation and resource-rational analysis's §5.4 yardstick-swap is a confirmed bridge: the paper cited for the paradigm's name independently performs the move §5.4 performs
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, lieder-griffiths, wason-selection-task
• MOC: The yardstick was wrong, not the reasoner — four rehabilitations of human rationality
  topic map 2026-10-24 · moc, rationality, bounded-rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis
• What genuinely connects Lieder & Griffiths (2020) citing Chater & Oaksford (1999) for the name 'rational analysis' and resource-rational analysis's §5.4 yardstick-swap
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-23 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, lieder-griffiths, wason-selection-task
• Dup-risk log: investigating the Anderson/Marr-extension <-> Oaksford-Chater-yardstick-swap bridge between two seed notes
  capture promoted 2026-10-22 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bridge-investigation, dup-risk
• Lieder & Griffiths (2020) cite Oaksford & Chater's 2007 Bayesian Rationality in a five-work psychology background list — a third, thinner citation alongside the 1994 and 1999 papers
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bayesian-cognition, cognitive-science
• Lieder & Griffiths (2020) list probability theory alongside expected utility and logic as a classical normative standard human behaviour violates and resource-rational analysis supersedes
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bayesian-cognition, cognitive-science
• Resource-rational analysis's 'Rationality revisited' section redefines cognitive bias as a violation of resource rationality, performing the swap-the-normative-standard move the vault catalogues as Oaksford & Chater's signature
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, rationality, bounded-rationality
• The cosine-0.85 pairing between Oaksford & Chater's uncertainty-redefinition of rationality and resource-rational analysis's utility-minus-cost formalism is a real but genealogical bridge, not a direct engagement
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bayesian-cognition, cross-domain-bridge
• Resource-rational analysis's own history-of-rationality section cites Oaksford & Chater's Bayesian Rationality (2007) and places its probability-based norm as the predecessor standard resource-rationality supersedes — the resemblance is real, carried by lineage more than by the citation itself
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-03 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, bayesian-cognition, cognitive-science
• Resource-rational analysis (Lieder & Griffiths 2020) directly cites Oaksford & Chater's Wason-task work — the resemblance to their optimal-data-selection paper is a real citation, not a false friend
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, bayesian-cognition
• Lieder & Griffiths (2020) cite Oaksford & Chater's 1994 optimal-data-selection paper by name as a worked example of how rational analysis explains apparent bias
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, bayesian-cognition
• Lieder & Griffiths (2020) cite Chater & Oaksford's 1999 retrospective, not Anderson (1990) alone, when naming 'rational analysis' as the paradigm resource-rational analysis extends
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, anderson, cognitive-science
• The cosine-0.85 pairing between the vault's Oaksford-Chater Wason-task claim and its resource-rational-analysis formalism claim is a confirmed bridge — a direct citation link, not shared ancestry
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-09-20 · resource-rationality, rational-analysis, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, cross-domain-bridge
• Resource-rational analysis's own target article cites Oaksford & Chater's Wason-task paper by name — the bipartite pair is a direct citation, not a shared-ancestor inference
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-19 · rational-analysis, resource-rationality, oaksford-chater, wason-selection-task, lieder-griffiths
• The Werbos/Oaksford-Chater 'optimization as theory of mind' bet and Gigerenzer's 'not optimization' flag are already linked in the vault — via rational analysis as the hinge, not a direct exchange
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-17 · optimization, theory-of-mind, rational-analysis, ecological-rationality, gigerenzer
• Did the Chater/Oaksford camp reply to Brighton's 2006 cross-validation reanalysis of the take-the-best result — and does the reversal stand?
  capture promoted 2026-08-02 · rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis, take-the-best, model-selection
• A search found no reply from Chater, Oaksford, Nakisa, or Redington to Brighton's 2006 cross-validation reanalysis
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-02 · rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis, take-the-best, gigerenzer
• Brighton's 2006 cross-validation reanalysis reversed Chater & Oaksford's take-the-best result, turning a direct terminological dispute into an empirical one
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-01 · rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis, take-the-best, heuristics
• Evans's 2009 BBS commentary flags Oaksford & Chater's enlistment of ecological rationality as unresolved — 'the link between the two programmes is unclear'
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-01 · rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis, bayesian-cognition, gigerenzer
• Ecological rationality and rational analysis are contested, not compatible, in the primary literature — three legs, not a settled division of labor
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-01 · rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis, bayesian-cognition, gigerenzer
• Capture: Are Gigerenzer's ecological rationality and Oaksford & Chater's rational analysis compatible or contested frameworks?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-07-31 · rationality, ecological-rationality, rational-analysis, bayesian-cognition, gigerenzer
• Werbos's optimal-control ADP and Oaksford–Chater's rational analysis make the same 'optimization as a theory of mind' bet from two independent disciplines
  observation seedling Tier 4 2026-07-12 · optimization, theory-of-mind, rational-analysis, werbos, oaksford-chater
• The Werbos–Oaksford/Chater bridge is real but relocated — optimization-as-theory-of-mind, and the objective function fixes the verdict
  capture promoted Tier 4 2026-07-11 · optimization, theory-of-mind, rational-analysis, werbos, oaksford-chater