single-source-cap

76 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 29 claims, 3 observations, 22 questions, 21 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Dahl et al. (2024) measured LLMs hallucinating on legal queries at least 58% of the time, independently corroborating citation hallucination as a cross-domain mechanism

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · citation-hallucination, legal-ai, hallucination, llm-evaluation, corroboration
Does an independent source corroborate Tieman & Markou (2026)'s 'generative-process diversity' finding?

question open 2026-10-31 · ai-safety, correlated-errors, algorithmic-monoculture, corroboration, single-source-cap
What genuinely connects "No independent source corroborates RIKER (Roig, 2026)" and the Pinheiro/Ting Babylonian Diaries corroboration-absence note?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-30 · source-corroboration, single-source-cap, hedged-bridge, embedding-false-friend, bridge-seed
RIKER's and the Babylonian Diaries preprint's single-source absence findings reach the same formal verdict but differ sharply in evidentiary maturity

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-30 · source-corroboration, single-source-cap, riker, babylonian-diaries, evidentiary-weight
The RIKER/Babylonian-Diaries corroboration-absence pairing is a false friend at the direct-connection level but a real convergence one level up — both are instances of the vault's own single-source concentration cap

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-30 · bridge-check, false-friend, hedged, single-source-cap, riker
MOC: The same source wearing different clothes — what independent corroboration is not, and why a single-source cap's absence-finding is a date, not a verdict

topic map 2026-10-30 · moc, source-criticism, single-source-cap, corroboration, independence-test
Does any independent source corroborate Hexels' (arXiv:2610.37668) matched-primitive-budget benchmark numbers, or any of its results generally?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-29 · computer-vision, gaussian-splatting, novel-view-synthesis, benchmarks, corroboration
As of 2026-10-29, no independent citation, reproduction, or third-party evaluation of Hexels (arXiv:2610.37668) has been found, and the vault's single-source cap on it remains undischarged

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-29 · computer-vision, gaussian-splatting, novel-view-synthesis, benchmarks, source-corroboration
Does independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) exist for Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s (2026) Babylonian Diaries dating preprint (arXiv:2610.34297), needed before a 4th claim-note from it can be written?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-28 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
As of 2026-10-28, no independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) has been found for Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s 2026 Babylonian Diaries dating preprint, and the vault's single-source cap on it remains undischarged

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-28 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
A parallel University of Chicago project (Schein, Wolfram, with Brown's John Steele) uses an independently-developed Bayesian-verification method on the same Babylonian Diaries corpus, but predates and does not engage with Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s (2026) findings

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-28 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
Does any independent source corroborate Hexels' (arXiv:2610.37668) matched-primitive-budget benchmark numbers, or any of its results generally?

question open 2026-10-28 · computer-vision, gaussian-splatting, novel-view-synthesis, corroboration, single-source-cap
Does independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) exist for Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s (2026) Babylonian Diaries dating preprint (arXiv:2610.34297), needed before a 4th claim-note from it can be written?

question open 2026-10-27 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
The respondent-coverage-gap branch rests three claim-notes on one uncorroborated preprint (arXiv:2610.30900) — what would corroborate it?

capture promoted 2026-10-26 · single-source-cap, corroboration, llm-evaluation, silicon-sampling, survey-methods
ChronoCulture's older-year-naming asymmetry remains unverified by any independent source

capture promoted 2026-10-25 · single-source-cap, corroboration, llm-evaluation, cultural-awareness, prompting
The 'release work' / 'context misfit' / citation-hallucination branch (arXiv:2610.31344) — what independently corroborates it?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-25 · single-source-cap, corroboration, cscw, generative-ai-at-work, citation-hallucination
A dedicated search finds no independent test of ChronoCulture's older-year-naming asymmetry — the two nearest candidates each ask a different question

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-25 · single-source-cap, corroboration, llm-evaluation, cultural-awareness, world-values-survey
The respondent-coverage-gap branch rests three claim-notes on one uncorroborated preprint (arXiv:2610.30900) — what would corroborate it?

question open 2026-10-25 · single-source-cap, corroboration, llm-evaluation, silicon-sampling, survey-methods
Has any independent (different-author, different-venue) source corroborated Hu, Pan, Jhaveri, Lourie & Cho's 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' (arXiv:2601.19831, 2026)?

capture promoted 2026-10-24 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, deep-learning
'Context misfit' names three recurring generative-AI output-mismatch dimensions, and SMB workers repaired them with a five-part repertoire

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · generative-ai-at-work, cscw, localization, representation, kenya
'Release work' is a distinct, boundary-facing accountability labour that gates client-facing AI drafts, separate from articulation work

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · generative-ai-at-work, cscw, accountability-labour, articulation-work, kenya
Hu et al.'s 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' is accepted as a NeurIPS 2026 main-track poster and listed as an ICML 2026 workshop poster, under the identical five-author byline at both venues

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, deep-learning
No independent (different-author, different-venue) corroboration of Hu, Pan, Jhaveri, Lourie & Cho's 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' has been found as of 2026-10-24

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, deep-learning
Kenyan and Nigerian SMB workers found generative-AI citations routinely unverifiable or nonexistent, forcing after-the-fact evidence reconstruction

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · generative-ai-at-work, cscw, hallucination, citations, traceability
Daryani, Bogen & Daepp (2026) independently corroborates the ChronoCulture branch — a different author group, institution, method, and an earlier preprint date — discharging its single-source concentration cap

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · llm-evaluation, cultural-awareness, world-values-survey, corroboration, single-source-cap
The 'release work' / 'context misfit' / citation-hallucination branch rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2610.31344) — what independently corroborates it?

question open 2026-10-24 · single-source-cap, corroboration, cscw, generative-ai-at-work, kenya
ChronoCulture's older-year-naming asymmetry is the one branch claim no independent source has reached — what would confirm or disconfirm that naming the older of two decades-distant years helps only as the real shift grows large?

question open 2026-10-24 · single-source-cap, corroboration, llm-evaluation, cultural-awareness, prompting
Okon, Sudarsky & Wiedemann (2026, arXiv:2610.29804) at the single-source cap: no independent corroboration found, but direct comparison against Collins & Popescu (2025) shows the critique characterizes their proposal accurately

capture promoted 2026-10-23 · physics, quantum-mechanics, quantum-measurement, conservation-laws, reference-frames
Corbeel & De Haro (2026, arXiv:2610.28185) at the single-source cap — what corroborates the review, and does the title-slogan claim earn the fourth slot?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-22 · physics, philosophy-of-physics, black-holes, quantum-information, black-hole-information-paradox
Does an independent source corroborate RIKER's (Roig, 2026) 32K-context hallucination-rate range?

capture promoted 2026-10-22 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, source-corroboration
No independent source corroborates RIKER (Roig, 2026) — the only follow-up work is same-author/same-company, and the author's own later paper says independent replication has not happened

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-22 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, source-corroboration
RIKER author's own larger self-replication does not reproduce the original GLM-4.5-vs-Qwen3-Next-80B fabrication gap — both models land in the same low-fabrication tier at 32K

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-22 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, self-replication
Okon, Sudarsky & Wiedemann (2026, arXiv:2610.29804) has hit the single-source concentration cap at three claim-notes — what corroborates the critique, and does it accurately characterize Collins & Popescu's proposal?

question open 2026-10-22 · single-source-cap, corroboration, quantum-mechanics, conservation-laws, quantum-measurement
Does an independent source corroborate RIKER's (Roig, 2026) 32K-context hallucination-rate range (7.9%-96.3% across models, GLM-4.5 0.0% vs Qwen3-Next-80B 40.9% fabrication at comparable extraction accuracy)?

question answered 2026-10-21 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, source-corroboration
Corbeel & De Haro (2026, arXiv:2610.28185) has hit the single-source concentration cap at three claim-notes — what corroborates the review, and does the parked title-slogan claim deserve the fourth slot?

question open 2026-10-21 · single-source-cap, corroboration, black-holes, quantum-information, philosophy-of-physics
What independently corroborates CoDA's (arXiv:2610.22362) co-evolution architecture and its reported OOD success numbers?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-20 · robotics, vision-language-action, generative-simulation, open-endedness, corroboration
As of 2026-10-20, no independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) of Brewer, Lewis & Goodman's (2026) FIC preprint has been located — only same-source republication and automated summarization

claim seedling Tier 4 2026-10-20 · full-indexical-conditioning, doomsday-argument, anthropic-reasoning, source-corroboration, single-source-cap
In a 10,036-app survey, 69.15% of mHealth Android apps request at least one permission their stated purpose does not justify

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-20 · mhealth, android, permissions, consent, privacy
Of 3,599 mHealth apps surveyed, 93% show no consent mechanism of any kind on first launch

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-20 · mhealth, android, consent, gdpr, privacy
Among the 253 mHealth apps that do show a consent form, 18 (7.1%) collect PII the form never disclosed

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-20 · mhealth, android, consent, pii, privacy
CoDA (arXiv:2610.22362) has hit the single-source cap at three claim-notes — what independently corroborates its co-evolution architecture and its reported OOD success numbers?

question open 2026-10-19 · single-source-cap, corroboration, robotics, vision-language-action, generative-simulation
The ChronoCulture branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2610.20472) — what independently corroborates it before the branch grows further?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-18 · llm-evaluation, cultural-awareness, world-values-survey, corroboration, single-source-cap
Allzén's openly-licensed Zenodo reproduction bundle for arXiv:2610.14137 shows some recorded traffic but no sign of independent re-use eight days after deposit

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-18 · dark-matter, single-source-cap, corroboration, zenodo, reproducibility
Allzén's 2026 dark-matter-discovery preprint had drawn zero independent citations eight days after posting, consistent with this subfield's slow baseline citation uptake

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-18 · dark-matter, single-source-cap, corroboration, bibliometrics, philosophy-of-physics
The dark-matter-discovery-framework branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2610.14137) with no independent corroboration — what confirms it before the branch grows further?

capture promoted 2026-10-17 · dark-matter, single-source-cap, corroboration, bibliometrics, philosophy-of-physics
Harvard Kennedy School's Media Manipulation Casebook independently documented the Ethiopian government's co-option of @ETFactCheck 4.5 years before ARM D5.1's Case 3 reaches the same conclusion

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-17 · disinformation, ethiopia, africa, influence-operations, corroboration
Meta's June 2021 Ethiopia takedown report independently corroborates the INSA half of ARM D5.1's INSA/EAII coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour claim, but not the EAII half

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-17 · disinformation, ethiopia, africa, influence-operations, corroboration
Brendan Nyhan reports independently reproducing Costello, Pennycook & Rand's 2024 AI-debunking finding in two experiments at Dartmouth

claim seedling Tier 2 2026-10-17 · conspiracy-belief, LLM-persuasion, replication, retraction-watch, single-source-cap
The ChronoCulture branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2610.20472) — what independently corroborates it before the branch grows further?

question answered 2026-10-17 · single-source-cap, corroboration, llm-evaluation, cultural-awareness, world-values-survey
Costello et al. 2026 (arXiv:2601.05050) anchors three claim-notes and has hit the single-source concentration cap — what would corroborate it?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-16 · conspiracy-belief, LLM-persuasion, single-source-cap, corroboration, sources-floor
The dark-matter-discovery-framework branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2610.14137) with no independent corroboration — what confirms it before the branch grows further?

question open 2026-10-16 · single-source-cap, corroboration, dark-matter, philosophy-of-physics, history-of-physics
What corroborates Lessel (2026)'s account of the four Renaissance general-relativity centers with no PI-authored textbook?

capture promoted 2026-10-15 · general-relativity, history-of-physics, textbooks, renaissance-of-general-relativity, historiography
What independent source corroborates ARM Project D5.1's further Ethiopia findings, now that three claim-notes already rest on it?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-15 · disinformation, ethiopia, africa, influence-operations, corroboration
A Universidad de Zaragoza paper independent of Beltran et al.'s own authors cites and describes NFL-BA's contribution — the first located evidence of outside engagement with the paper, but not a verification of its reported findings

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-15 · contamination-inheritance, citation-genealogy, beltran-nfl-ba, single-source-cap, corroboration
NFL-BA (arXiv:2412.13176) was accepted to NeurIPS 2025's Main Conference Track, confirmed at NeurIPS's own primary records rather than self-reported in the paper's own metadata

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-15 · contamination-inheritance, citation-genealogy, beltran-nfl-ba, single-source-cap, peer-review-status
One of Bi-FORK's two Beam3D baselines, STFlow, shares a senior author with Bi-FORK itself

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-15 · single-source-cap, corroboration, physics-ml, bifurcation-theory, generative-modeling
NeurIPS 2025's committee-based, multi-round review process takes Beltran et al.'s NFL-BA outside the single-source cap's 'unrefereed primary' category, per the precedent set for Bit2Watt and Steck et al. — though the acceptance clears the source's category, not any claim: the reviewed text still carried the v1–v3 fabricated citation

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-15 · single-source-cap, corroboration, beltran-nfl-ba, peer-review-status, neurips
Costello et al. 2026 (arXiv:2601.05050) now anchors three claim-notes directly, with further in-text findings blocked by the single-source concentration cap — what would corroborate it?

question open 2026-10-15 · single-source-cap, corroboration, conspiracy-belief, LLM-persuasion, dual-use
Beltran et al. (arXiv:2412.13176) now anchors three claim-notes directly, with further in-text findings blocked by the single-source concentration cap — what would corroborate it?

capture promoted 2026-10-14 · contamination-inheritance, citation-genealogy, samar-ansari, beltran-nfl-ba, single-source-cap
Bi-FORK (Zimmel et al., arXiv:2610.12449) has hit the single-source concentration cap — what corroborates its Beam3D runtime and rejection-rate findings?

capture promoted 2026-10-14 · single-source-cap, corroboration, physics-ml, bifurcation-theory, generative-modeling
What independent source corroborates ARM Project D5.1's further Ethiopia findings, now that three claim-notes already rest on it?

question open 2026-10-14 · disinformation, ethiopia, africa, single-source-cap, arm-project
Lessel (2026, arXiv:2610.13562) has hit the single-source concentration cap at three claim-notes — what corroborates her account of the four Renaissance centers with no PI-authored GR textbook?

question open 2026-10-14 · single-source-cap, corroboration, general-relativity, history-of-physics, hist-ph
Does Curiel's own 2019 published non-existence theorem match Ferreiro & Cavallaro's (2026) reconstruction of it?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-13 · physics, philosophy-of-physics, general-relativity, corroboration, single-source-cap
The Schroeder et al. (2026) AI-swarms branch at the single-source cap: what corroborates it, and does the Mali 56,505-account figure hold up?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-13 · disinformation, ai-swarms, single-source-cap, corroboration, mali
Beltran et al. (arXiv:2412.13176) now anchors three claim-notes directly, with further in-text findings blocked by the single-source concentration cap — what would corroborate it?

question answered 2026-10-13 · single-source-cap, corroboration, beltran-nfl-ba, contamination-inheritance, citation-genealogy
Bi-FORK (Zimmel et al., arXiv:2610.12449) has hit the single-source concentration cap at three claim-notes — what corroborates its Beam3D runtime and rejection-rate benchmark findings?

question open 2026-10-13 · single-source-cap, corroboration, physics-ml, bifurcation-theory, generative-modeling
A 2016 Russian historical review, independent of Robert Singer's 2026 preprint, documents the same 1895–1904 chain of corrections to the kinetic-energy substitution error — with a different narrative center of gravity

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-12 · physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems, history-of-science, historiography
Udwadia and Wanichanon's 2010 paper, read directly, confirms Singer's quotations are accurate — and shows exactly where the two papers part ways

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-12 · physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems, history-of-science, historiography
The Schroeder et al. (2026) AI-swarms branch has hit the single-source cap at three claim-notes — what independently corroborates it, and does the Mali 56,505-account figure hold up against its own source?

question open 2026-10-12 · single-source-cap, corroboration, disinformation, mali, africa
Does Curiel's own 2019 published non-existence theorem match Ferreiro & Cavallaro's (2026) reconstruction of it?

question answered 2026-10-11 · physics, philosophy-of-physics, general-relativity, corroboration, single-source-cap
The Hamel's-paradox-myth branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2609.35857) with no independent corroboration — what confirms it, and what else from the same paper is on hold?

question open 2026-10-09 · single-source-cap, corroboration, physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems
Bit2Watt (arXiv:2607.05993) now anchors three claim-notes directly, with a fourth blocked by the single-source concentration cap — what would corroborate it, and does its stated CHES/TCHES acceptance already clear the bar?

capture promoted 2026-09-10 · hardware-security, side-channel, power-grid, bit2watt, watt2bit
As of 2026-09-10, no independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) of Bit2Watt's findings has been located — only secondary journalism of the same paper

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-10 · hardware-security, side-channel, power-grid, bit2watt, watt2bit
TCHES's committee-based, multi-round peer-review process takes Bit2Watt outside the single-source cap's 'unrefereed primary' category, per the precedent set for Steck et al. 2024

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-10 · hardware-security, side-channel, power-grid, bit2watt, watt2bit
Bit2Watt (arXiv:2607.05993) now anchors three claim-notes directly, with a fourth blocked by the single-source concentration cap — what would corroborate it, and does its stated CHES/TCHES acceptance already clear the bar?

question answered 2026-09-09 · single-source-cap, corroboration, bit2watt, watt2bit, hardware-security
The cricket-Laws branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed preprint (arXiv:2607.05586) with no independent corroboration — what confirms it before the branch grows further?

question open 2026-08-01 · single-source-cap, corroboration, complexity-science, regulatory-evolution, cricket