all tags

brooks

24 notes carry this tag — 9 claims, 7 observations, 3 questions, 5 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• What genuinely connects claim-brooks-1991-does-not-cite-dreyfus and claim-david-brachet-2011-citing-papers-contain-zero-ml-work: both are the vault's argument-from-silence method testing whether a cross-field name-echo hides real lineage — not the same mechanism, but the same higher-order pattern the vault already calls the jingle fallacy
  capture promoted 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, jingle-fallacy, brooks, dreyfus
• What genuinely connects claim-brooks-1991-does-not-cite-dreyfus and claim-kodosky-hopl-reference-list-omits-dennis-citation-unverified-mechanism: not subject matter but the vault's own named method, applied at opposite evidentiary extremes
  capture promoted 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, kodosky
• The vault's Brooks/Dreyfus and David-Brachet-citing-papers negative-citation findings are both argument-from-silence instances, but only the Brooks/Dreyfus pair is tagged and MOC-indexed as such
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, david-brachet
• The Brooks/Dreyfus and David-Brachet/catastrophic-forgetting bridges share a method but not a mechanism — one silence is a documented redaction, the other is (so far) undocumented non-contact
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, catastrophic-forgetting
• The Brooks/Dreyfus and Kodosky/Dennis argument-from-silence checks share the same method — testing an assumed lineage against the founding theorist a later practitioner is measured against — but sit at opposite ends of the evidentiary-strength range the vault's own McGrew-based framework grades
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, kodosky
• Brooks's and Dreyfus's identically-titled 'Intelligence without representation' papers are an untagged jingle-fallacy instance, alongside the vault's other named one (organizational vs. catastrophic forgetting)
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · jingle-fallacy, argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus
• moc-argument-from-silence's cluster list and the tags on claim-kodosky-hopl-reference-list-omits-dennis-citation-unverified-mechanism do not reflect that it is a structurally identical instance of the vault's negative-citation method
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, kodosky
• Two independent sessions and eleven distinct access routes into Brooks's Flesh and Machines (2002) all fail, pointing to a structural barrier rather than a search gap
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-07-18 · brooks, flesh-and-machines, dreyfus, primary-source-verification, source-availability
• Google Books' working full-text index for Flesh and Machines returns zero matches for 'Dreyfus' and 'Heidegger' — an inconclusive indexing gap, not evidence the credit-quote is absent
  observation seedling Tier 1 for the fact that these exact Google Books search results were returned this session (directly observed); 3 for Kurzweil's corroboration 2026-07-18 · brooks, dreyfus, flesh-and-machines, quote-verification, argument-from-silence
• Does Brooks's Flesh and Machines (2002), p.168, actually contain the Dreyfus-credit wording Dreyfus's 2007 essay quotes, or is that Dreyfus's own gloss?
  capture promoted 2026-07-16 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, embodied-cognition
• Brooks's 1986 predecessor memo to "Intelligence Without Representation" cites Dreyfus twice by name and frames its entire argument as a rebuttal to him
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Per Dreyfus's own 2007 quotation of it, Brooks's 2002 book Flesh and Machines credits Dreyfus with being right about body-world coupling
  claim seedling Tier 1 for 'Dreyfus's 2007 essay contains this quotation'; the inner quote's exact wording against Brooks's own book is [unverified-quote] 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Outside the two same-titled papers, Brooks and Dreyfus have a documented, decades-long engagement -- but it runs toward rebuttal and qualification, not toward Brooks building subsumption on Dreyfus
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Brooks's own account of A.I. Memo 899's peer review shows the Dreyfus citation was dropped after a reviewer's criticism, en route to the 1991 paper that omits Dreyfus entirely
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Jordanous's 2020 historical review frames Dreyfus as a "precursor" to Brooks by comparing conclusions, not by citing any documented exchange between them
  claim seedling Tier 2 -- named academic, own peer-reviewed venue, judgment-of-influence read as her own historiographical framing rather than a report of a documented exchange 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Does Brooks's Flesh and Machines (2002), p.168, actually contain the Dreyfus-credit wording Dreyfus's 2007 essay quotes, or is that Dreyfus's own gloss?
  question open 2026-07-15 · brooks, dreyfus, embodied-cognition, philosophy-of-ai, primary-source
• Does any secondary source document an acknowledged Brooks–Dreyfus link, or does the "lineage" live entirely in later commentators reading the two same-titled papers side by side?
  capture promoted 2026-07-13 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Does Rodney Brooks's 1991 "Intelligence Without Representation" actually build on Dreyfus's anti-representation critique, and how explicitly?
  capture promoted 2026-07-12 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• In §7.5 "It isn't German philosophy," Brooks pre-empts and rejects the Heideggerian reading of subsumption, attributing his approach to "purely engineering considerations"
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · brooks, dreyfus, heidegger, subsumption, robotics
• Brooks's 1991 "Intelligence Without Representation" does not cite Dreyfus anywhere in its text or 15-entry reference list
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• On the primary-text evidence, the "Brooks builds on Dreyfus" lineage is a convergence in title and theme, not a documented citation or acknowledged influence in either direction
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Dreyfus's own same-titled 2002 "Intelligence Without Representation" is built on Merleau-Ponty and Freeman and never mentions Brooks, robotics, or the subsumption architecture
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · dreyfus, brooks, merleau-ponty, phenomenology, anti-representation
• Does any secondary source document an *acknowledged* Brooks–Dreyfus link, or does the "lineage" live entirely in later commentators reading the two same-titled papers side by side?
  question answered 2026-07-12 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation
• Does Rodney Brooks's 1991 "Intelligence Without Representation" actually build on Dreyfus's anti-representation critique, and how explicitly?
  question answered 2026-07-09 · brooks, dreyfus, subsumption, robotics, anti-representation